Is sexual imagery in magazine advertizing, and music videos corrupting our youth? - early pre teen models
What do you think that designers are models that take less than 17 years and their products for adult women who use more than 35 years?
Fashion has no responsibility to enforce morality or social or moral way is immoral by nature?
Is it morally right for the models are young people aged 14 to 17, since as sexually provocative poses to sell a product at an adult audience?
Help is sexual advertising, eager to make a public, pre-adolescents and adolescents who have tried to imitate the images they see in magazines, videos and music?
Do you think that these images leads to early experimentation with sexuality among adolescents, a rise of pedophilia in our culture?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/fe ...
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Early Pre Teen Models Is Sexual Imagery In Magazine Advertizing, And Music Videos Corrupting Our Youth?
21 comments:
# 1 The fashion industry has used for decades, teen models. Brooke Shields in her Calvin Klein day was under 17 when she said: "Nothing comes between me and my Calvin's. It's not fair, he invited the young people being seen as sexual objects for adult men. Jon Benet Ramsey was organized to seen as an adult and was sexually abused and murdered.
# 2 The sole responsibility of the mode is to sell clothes. While fashion dictates that style or out, which is for the "fashion" are used and how it will look. The way of the abandoned child, '90 'sa destroyed a large amount of self-esteem of women and forced many to realize the weight to the point of starvation. It's not fair, and women in the pressure and say NO. There is a strong desire to "look" a certain way, is plastic surgery a shallow indulgence that many because they have the desire to look a certain way. People are everywhere shallow, and the desire to adoption because of the approach is a strong impetus from the United StatesNo society.
# 3 Music videos with the superstars of the simulation of sexual acts are responsible flirting teenagers act provocatively. I remember something about a girl of 4 years of imitating the high maximum torque to Britney Spears. The solution is to turn off the TV, all parents need more control over what their children are exposed to, as I fear that most do not care.
# 4 Everything you need to do is look at half of the questions that teenagers and young people in this forum, know that something has gone wrong with the parents, and society. My room is full of teenagers flirting on the Internet.
Its unfortunate that this power is pedophilia, because if it is not easily accessible, not to society as a malfunction.
On the one hand, I think, be given to issues, the real debate. Because I never want to present my 17 years in sexually provocative image.
Also do not think that the fashion industry is responsible, but to give to what they want. The media are a reflection of the people, vice versa.
And if the rise of pedophilia in the country, we have a history of pedophilia. Men are naturally obliged to women who are attracted more furtile. These women randomly adolescents. I do not agree, but how are the people. The media claim that we are the mirror.
Its all about money money money and i love money, I can not answer this question
Fashion is not immoral ........ is amoral.
His moral ....... v Who cares.
If you are injured - do not buy clothes.
There is a reason sex sells.
If we stop opressing Sun - Work personalized.
No. .. I am 27 years old. If you remember us? Generation X? We have nothing to do with our lives, everything, fusing rap music and video games, and sex among teenagers, our minds ... Well, I know everyone is good ... Hip Shake like Elvis, was sexually explicit and AC / DC and Kiss are the servants of Satan, and is now practiced in all the great rock stations and weddings in the U.S.
No. .. I am 27 years old. If you remember us? Generation X? We have nothing to do with our lives, everything, fusing rap music and video games, and sex among teenagers, our minds ... Well, I know everyone is good ... Hip Shake like Elvis, was sexually explicit and AC / DC and Kiss are the servants of Satan, and is now practiced in all the great rock stations and weddings in the U.S.
To answer your question, I think would be helpful if you can include links to various websites with images of girls aged 14 to 17 have placed in sexually provocative.
In this way you can carefully review your request and a reasonable answer. To thank you for it in advance.
The more we are willing to tolerate the example of advertising agencies and other models, magazines, etc. .. longer occur. It is the greed that leads them our money, then where is the stop sign, but in our hands in our wallets.
The answer is a resounding YES!
You can not just blame corrupt our youth, but has made a decisive contribution.
The emphasis has been placed in the wrong place and did it on purpose, it is immoral.
I think that young people who go wrong a good relationship with your parents. While people can not tolerate open the image presented to young people, in fact, you can not lock to see your children. The best thing to do is let your children know that it is acceptable to you. Ignoring their children until they something they do not like it do not cut it. You need to ensure a lasting relationship with them. Pedophilia is a different social disorder. The acceptability of the Association of Children's sexually provocative clothes is not pedophiles, you encourage people to be more open, but can not "create" news.
I think that sex is part of human nature, is a part of our culture, and an immutable part of life. You can not sweep under the rug and pretend does not exist. Teens do have sex, and no matter what, and it is better, the issues of safe sex address, instead of banning the experience at all. More than sex became a taboo, so that one can not speak, the more you put into the ground. Do not go away.
Regarding the responses of others, the fashion industry have a moral responsibility? He makes a point. I do not think should be the model underage girls sexually provocative poses, but how can we define what is to be sexually provocative. Otherwise, the parents should have more responsibility in the upbringing of their children. When the media end up spoiling their children, as they are to blame - no media exposure because exposure is almost certain - but not to teach moral and confidence of their children.
And I really think that girls are inclined to thehow to have sex too early, lack of confidence. Sex tends to these young people who do not fit with the pictures validate embedded in the media.
I think that sex is part of human nature, is a part of our culture, and an immutable part of life. You can not sweep under the rug and pretend does not exist. Teens do have sex, and no matter what, and it is better, the issues of safe sex address, instead of banning the experience at all. More than sex became a taboo, so that one can not speak, the more you put into the ground. Do not go away.
Regarding the responses of others, the fashion industry have a moral responsibility? He makes a point. I do not think should be the model underage girls sexually provocative poses, but how can we define what is to be sexually provocative. Otherwise, the parents should have more responsibility in the upbringing of their children. When the media end up spoiling their children, as they are to blame - no media exposure because exposure is almost certain - but not to teach moral and confidence of their children.
And I really think that girls are inclined to thehow to have sex too early, lack of confidence. Sex tends to these young people who do not fit with the pictures validate embedded in the media.
Not all.
The most important thing is that parents talk to their children understand about these things, and helps them to interpret how the child is not a guide or an example of its use own behavior.
Not really.
Yes to the above. Advertising is the promotion of pedophiles and sex offenders. have more responsibility. and our poor children. You need to look or overweight or ugly. Bull hockey. True beauty comes from within. that the message is not that TV offers. living for themselves and not at all.
and carry forward God.
Blessed
Yes to the above. Advertising is the promotion of pedophiles and sex offenders. have more responsibility. and our poor children. You need to look or overweight or ugly. Bull hockey. True beauty comes from within. that the message is not that TV offers. living for themselves and not at all.
and carry forward God.
Blessed
I think so ... I also think its goin to get worse before better
No. Absolutely not. Parental neglect is what destroy our youth.
NOT becuz if the child is very intelligent, he / she had 2 episodes Juss evrybody becuz no one is done or wearin
Whether it's corrupting our youth or not, I think it takes a much deeper problem. The fact that the companies believe that advertising will be increased opportunities for weighing result, Up-Tight, conservative society houses prohibitive America. Look at how sex and nudity is in almost all other actors involved in these things are represented, and you will see a significant shortfall in this issue. Personally, I blame the Puritans.
Absolutley corrupt society. Not only for youngsters but also older women. Watch the wave of anti-aging products out there.
Post a Comment